Book A Call
Offshore teams  ·  9 October 2026

Offshore Employee Wins ‘Australian-Based’ Status: What SMEs Need to Know

An offshore employee recently won 'Australian-based' status in an unfair dismissal application, creating critical legal considerations for Australian SMEs. This case highlights the need to structure employment correctly to mitigate unfair dismissal risks and ensure compliance with Australian labour laws.

Offshore Employee Wins ‘Australian-Based’ Status: What SMEs Need to Know

Australian business owners with offshore teams need to pay close attention to a recent HR Leader report from October 7, 2026. An offshore employee successfully argued they were ‘Australian-based’ in an unfair dismissal application, a decision that carries significant cost and compliance implications for any SME employing remote international staff. This ruling means that even if your team member is physically located overseas, they could still be subject to Australian employment law, including unfair dismissal provisions. The financial risk of getting this wrong can be substantial, involving legal fees, compensation payouts, and reputational damage, potentially running into tens of thousands of dollars.

Understanding the ‘Australian-Based’ Ruling for Offshore Staff

The HR Leader report on October 7, 2026, details a case where an offshore employee was deemed ‘Australian-based’ for unfair dismissal purposes. This decision isn’t about where someone physically sits, but rather the nature of their employment relationship and connection to Australia. Factors like where the contract was signed, the governing law specified in the contract, the currency of payment, the location of management, and the integration into the Australian business’s operations can all play a role. For an Australian SME, this means you can no longer assume that simply having an employee working from the Philippines or elsewhere automatically exempts you from Australian labour laws. If an offshore employee successfully claims ‘Australian-based’ status, they gain access to the Fair Work Commission, potentially leading to costly unfair dismissal claims, reinstatement orders, or compensation. This adds a layer of complexity to your offshore staffing model that needs careful management to avoid unexpected legal battles and financial penalties.

Structuring Employment to Mitigate Unfair Dismissal Risks

To protect your business from the risks highlighted by the recent HR Leader case, it’s crucial to structure your offshore employment relationships correctly. The key is to clearly define the legal jurisdiction governing the employment. This usually involves having robust, locally compliant employment contracts in the country where your offshore team member resides. For example, if your team is in the Philippines, their contract should be governed by Philippine labour law, not Australian law. This clarity helps establish that they are not ‘Australian-based’ for legal purposes. It’s also vital to ensure that your operational practices align with this contractual arrangement. This means managing performance, conducting disciplinary actions, and processing terminations according to the local laws of the offshore employee’s country. Implementing clear performance review structures, as discussed in Dynamic Business on October 6, 2026, can also help avoid disputes, regardless of jurisdiction. Getting this right can save your business significant legal fees and potential compensation payouts, which can easily run into the thousands if a claim proceeds to the Fair Work Commission.

The Importance of Clear Contracts and Local Compliance

The recent ruling underscores that a poorly drafted contract or a lack of understanding of local labour laws can be a costly oversight for Australian SMEs. If your offshore employee’s contract is vague about governing law, or if it inadvertently creates a strong connection to Australia, you could be exposed. This means every offshore employee needs a contract that explicitly states the applicable jurisdiction, usually the country where they are physically working. Beyond the contract, you must also comply with that country’s labour laws regarding minimum wages, working conditions, leave entitlements, and termination processes. For example, if you have an offshore team in the Philippines, you need to understand the specifics of Philippine labour law, which can differ significantly from Australian standards. This level of detail might seem daunting, but it’s essential for risk management. A fractional HR partner can help navigate these complexities, ensuring your contracts are solid and your practices are compliant in both Australia and your offshore locations. This proactive approach is far more cost-effective than dealing with an unfair dismissal claim in Australia, which can involve legal costs and potential payouts.

Practical Steps for Australian Business Owners

Given the October 7, 2026, HR Leader report, Australian business owners need to take immediate action to review their offshore employment arrangements. First, audit all existing offshore employee contracts to ensure they clearly specify the governing law of the employee’s resident country. If they don’t, seek legal advice to update them. Second, familiarise yourself with the basic labour laws of the countries where your offshore team members are located. This includes understanding local termination requirements, which can be complex. Third, ensure your HR practices, from onboarding to performance management and dismissal, are consistent with the specified local laws. As Human Resources Director noted on October 9, 2026, ‘Nobody wants to let good people go’, but when dismissals are necessary, they must be handled correctly. This might involve setting up a local entity or engaging with an Employer of Record (EOR) service in the offshore country. While these options have costs, they are often significantly less than the potential expenses of an unfair dismissal claim in Australia, which can include legal fees, compensation, and the time spent defending the claim. Understanding how ACTIv8 works can provide clarity on managing these risks effectively, and our plans and pricing offer tailored solutions.

Not sure what this means for your business? Book a 20 minute call with ACTIv8. Straight answers, no hard sell, and if you do not need us we will say so.

Sources

Book A Call ← Back to the blog